P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Pennsylvania confronted a new hiccup in its democratic framework as authorities revealed that casting a ballot machines in a single district unintentionally.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
A ballot machines unintentionally flipped electors' reactions to an inquiry regarding holding state judges, making sense of that a coding blunder caused the issue.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
The polling form question with respect to Pennsylvania Unrivaled Court Judges Jack Panella and Victor Stabile and how it accidentally exchanged "Yes" and "No" votes.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Explain that each casting a ballot machine in the province was impacted, however just the inquiry concerning the adjudicators was failing.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Guarantee perusers that authorities are doing whatever it takes to fix the coding blunder and count votes as expected during the count.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Feature that Political decision Frameworks and Programming, the maker of the machines, took responsibility for botch.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Examine what such occurrences can mean for citizen certainty and their view of the discretionary cycle.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Look at measures and shields that can be set up to forestall comparable blunders in ongoing races.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
Investigate the public's response to the episode and any worries raised by citizens.
P.C. PHILADELPHIA
The coding mistake, electors can have certainty that their expectations will be precisely reflected in the last count, and that actions will be taken to forestall such occurrences later on.